full
Episode 418 - Stories of Deception
Topics:
(05:52) Misleading Headlines
(07:16) UK Tories Clip To Mislead
(13:01) Navalny Murdered?
(19:06) Confiscate Russian Assets
(22:16) Assange Art Ransom
(27:24) Nuclear Support Is Low
(30:05) Dr Yang Hengjun
(34:01) Indian Uniform Code
(36:43) Trump Update
(45:51) UK Youth
(55:11) Analysts Say ...
Chapters, images & show notes powered by vizzy.fm.
To financially support the Podcast you can make:
- a per-episode donation via Patreon or
- one-off donation via credit card; or
- one-off or regular donations via Paypal or
- if you are into Cryptocurrency you can send Satoshis.
We Livestream every Monday night at 8:00 pm Brisbane time. Follow us on Facebook or YouTube. Watch us live and join the discussion in the chat room.
You can sign up for our newsletter, which links to articles that Trevor has highlighted as potentially interesting and that may be discussed on the podcast. You will get 3 emails per week.
We have a website. www.ironfistvelvetglove.com.au
You can email us. The address is trevor@ironfistvelvetglove.com.au
You can send us a voicemail message at Speakpipe
We have a sister podcast called IFVG Evergreen. It is a collection of evergreen content from the weekly podcast.
Transcripts started in episode 324. You can use this link to search our transcripts. Type "iron fist velvet glove" into the search directory, click on our podcast and then do a word search. It even has a player which will play the relevant section. It is incredibly quick.
Transcript
Suburban Eastern Australia, an environment that has, over time,
Speaker:evolved some extraordinarily unique groups of Homo sapiens.
Speaker:But today, we observe a small tribe akin to a group of meerkats that
Speaker:gather together atop a small mound to watch, question and discuss the
Speaker:current events of their city, their country and their world at large.
Speaker:Let's listen keenly and observe this group fondly known as the
Speaker:Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove.
Speaker:Ah, we're already getting some tough chat in the chat room.
Speaker:John says we're 63 seconds late.
Speaker:Watley's there, meerkatting patiently.
Speaker:That's what you need to do, John.
Speaker:Meerkatting patiently.
Speaker:Alright, maybe we were 63 seconds late, but we're, you
Speaker:know, better late than never.
Speaker:Here we are.
Speaker:The Iron Fist, the Velvet Glove and Joe the Tech Guy.
Speaker:Doing a podcast where we talk about news and politics and sex and religion on a
Speaker:Monday night, eight o'clock Brisbane time.
Speaker:I'm in Brisbane, Joe's in Brisbane, and Scott, you're in regional Queensland.
Speaker:How are you, Scott?
Speaker:I'm good, thanks.
Speaker:Trevor, and yourself?
Speaker:I am well.
Speaker:I'm a little bit sore, but I am well.
Speaker:You're a little bit sore?
Speaker:What have you done to yourself?
Speaker:I was in a squash competition, a masters squash competition over the weekend and I
Speaker:had four very, very hard games of squash.
Speaker:I could barely walk on Monday morning.
Speaker:Getting down the stairs, but it was enjoyable.
Speaker:How'd you go?
Speaker:I came second in Division 1.
Speaker:I was pretty good.
Speaker:Yeah, I was pretty pleased with that.
Speaker:So, um, you tell people that you're a squash player and they go, What?
Speaker:Do they still play squash?
Speaker:Yeah, so, some old people still do.
Speaker:Joe, the tech guy, how are you?
Speaker:I'm good.
Speaker:That's good.
Speaker:John has, uh, joined us or yeah, John and Watley are there, so it's good.
Speaker:Uh, got your message, John.
Speaker:Yes, um, last week, I think I mentioned about Joe Biden and how he
Speaker:was escaping liability for having a stash of classified documents on the
Speaker:basis of being so senile, nobody would believe that he intended to do it.
Speaker:And the guys at, uh, the Planet Extra podcast did an exhaustive, lengthy,
Speaker:forensic examination of the report, which in the end says there's a lot more
Speaker:to it than that, in fact, proving even had control of documents the way it was
Speaker:alleged was in doubt, so there's a lot more to it than what I said, and if you
Speaker:want to know the full story Go and watch that Planet Extra podcast, but, uh Well,
Speaker:and of course, his bribes he was taking.
Speaker:The witness to taking the bribes apparently has now been charged
Speaker:with bearing false witness.
Speaker:Oh, okay.
Speaker:By the FBI.
Speaker:I see, I haven't got to that part.
Speaker:So, yeah, if you're at a dinner party on that particular topic, dear listener,
Speaker:and you just say, oh, it was all about his senility And, uh, proving his
Speaker:intent, uh, is a lot more than that.
Speaker:So don't rely on the Iron Fist, Velvet Glove facts for that.
Speaker:But, uh, on most things we've been pretty good, but that one, maybe just, um, change
Speaker:your thoughts on that one a little bit.
Speaker:Um, guys, next week, one of the things they do on the PEP sort of podcast, is
Speaker:they kick off with what they're grateful for, just as a way of getting some
Speaker:positive, good vibes at the beginning.
Speaker:Because invariably They, and we, head down a track of just bemoaning
Speaker:what's going on in the world.
Speaker:So maybe next week, if we could be prepared to have something you're
Speaker:grateful for, it could be personal.
Speaker:Yes.
Speaker:It could be baby Jesus, it could be something on a worldwide scale, or
Speaker:something on a very minuscule scale where you happen to have a fine cup of
Speaker:coffee presented to you that morning.
Speaker:I don't care, but let's just try and have something positive for next time, so.
Speaker:So there we go.
Speaker:Essential Lord Don is in the chat room as well.
Speaker:Well, what are we going to talk about, uh, on this episode?
Speaker:Kind of following on the theme of previous episodes, just looking a little
Speaker:bit at how the public is misled, either by the media or by political parties.
Speaker:Um, we've got Navalny.
Speaker:Um, was he murdered?
Speaker:We'll talk about that.
Speaker:Um.
Speaker:Apparently there was a window that he fell out of.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Julian Assange, uh, support for nuclear power.
Speaker:That might interest you, John Simmons.
Speaker:Um, bit about China.
Speaker:Um, bit about Muslims in India.
Speaker:A bit about the cases that Trump is facing and just the sort of timetable on those.
Speaker:Joe found an article about why UK youth are so disgruntled and disenchanted with
Speaker:life, and particularly political leaders.
Speaker:And I came across from an article from the ABC, which is really about China
Speaker:setting up some humble research stations on Antarctica and just beaten up.
Speaker:Into a potential, this is how they're going to control the world.
Speaker:Watch out for those nasty Chinese.
Speaker:They're taking over Antarctica because of a terrible plot against
Speaker:Western civilization, sort of story.
Speaker:Anyway, we'll get to that one.
Speaker:Yeah, see how we go.
Speaker:So that's on the agenda.
Speaker:Right.
Speaker:Just on the media, and we've mentioned, it might have been last week or
Speaker:the week before, just about how The media has used different words
Speaker:when describing Israel's actions as opposed to the Palestinian actions.
Speaker:You might remember that, you know, massacre and, and, um, uh, harsh
Speaker:words like that were reserved for what had been done to Israel.
Speaker:And much softer words were used, um, People's, um, people were found dead, um,
Speaker:when it came to what Israelis had done to Palestinians, whereas Palestinians
Speaker:were actually murdering people.
Speaker:Like the nature of the, sort of, words were different.
Speaker:And there was just Uh, an article in the Washington Post, the headline
Speaker:was, Four Fragile Lives Found Ended in Evacuated Gaza Hospital.
Speaker:Um, apparently they changed that headline not long after it was
Speaker:originally printed, but, uh, yeah.
Speaker:Instead of saying four young kids murdered by Israeli bombs,
Speaker:it was, Four Fragile Lives Found Ended in Evacuated Gaza Hospital.
Speaker:So, that's the sort of subtle Sort of, um, thought massaging that just goes
Speaker:on if you're not on the lookout for it.
Speaker:Um, another type of thought massaging.
Speaker:This one was from the UK.
Speaker:So, Joe, Conservatives are really on the nose over there in the UK.
Speaker:You don't have to be there, I guess, to know that's the case.
Speaker:So I just saw a Jonathan Pie today that was saying Rishi
Speaker:Senak, telling everyone he's, he's delivering, uh, but delivering what?
Speaker:And the answer is a recession.
Speaker:Apparently the UK is now in recession.
Speaker:After 14 years of Conservative government.
Speaker:Is Jonathan Pye still doing stuff, is he?
Speaker:He is, yes.
Speaker:Oh, I haven't seen any for ages.
Speaker:Somehow I must have slipped off his page, because, yeah.
Speaker:So, so there's a Tory, the Tory chairman is Richard Holden, and he
Speaker:defended a misleading video that the Tory party had put on there.
Speaker:X account, their Twitter account, and it was a clip by, um, it
Speaker:was a clip involving Sadiq Khan.
Speaker:Sadiq Khan.
Speaker:Yes.
Speaker:He's the Mayor of London.
Speaker:Yes.
Speaker:And, um, he said in the, sort of an interview, he said, quote, As
Speaker:far as I'm concerned, that sort of language isn't acceptable, and it
Speaker:certainly shouldn't be accepted in a party like mine that is proud to be
Speaker:both anti racist and anti Semitic.
Speaker:And so, of course, he misspoke by saying that his party is
Speaker:proud to be anti Semitic.
Speaker:And he straight away quickly corrected himself and said, I beg
Speaker:your pardon, tackling anti Semitism.
Speaker:So, it was to say, I mean, I've done a lot on this podcast where I've referred
Speaker:to the wrong thing, the complete opposite to what I meant to say.
Speaker:And he kind of, dear listener, cut me some slack and go, uh, he was actually
Speaker:referring to this rather than that, you know, it was just a A mistake.
Speaker:People make them.
Speaker:But the goddamn Conservative Tory Party clipped the part where he said his party
Speaker:is proud to be anti racist and anti Semitic, chopped it off there and ran,
Speaker:um, you know, a tweet, um, uh, basically to demonstrate that the Labor Party has
Speaker:a, has a problem when it comes to Jews.
Speaker:Completely misleading people as to what the guy was actually saying.
Speaker:And the chairman, when pulled up by reporters, was saying, Oh, you
Speaker:know, it was edited, but we didn't rearrange anything, he actually said
Speaker:those things, so, it's all good.
Speaker:This is the level.
Speaker:This isn't some crazy two bit party of wacky Well, you say that.
Speaker:Well, yeah.
Speaker:LAUGHS That's what they They are now.
Speaker:Like, this is not a legitimate, serious Group anymore.
Speaker:The, you know, the UK Tory party is prepared to do
Speaker:something as misleading of that.
Speaker:You can't trust anything they say about anybody.
Speaker:I'm shocked, I tell you.
Speaker:Oh, either I am like, that's just so cheap and so open to ridicule.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:I mean, yeah, apparently.
Speaker:No, I don't blame you.
Speaker:But by the same token, I'm not surprised that that sort of
Speaker:shit has started to happen.
Speaker:I don't know that this is necessarily a new thing, taking people out
Speaker:of context or misquoting them.
Speaker:No, but they've actually gone and doctored a video and that sort
Speaker:of stuff and then re released it.
Speaker:Yeah, and they say it wasn't doctored because they just Cut it off at that
Speaker:point and didn't rearrange any of the words, but by taking it out of the
Speaker:context Yeah, so many things in life that we examine on this podcast dear
Speaker:listener You need to know some of the background context to sort of understand
Speaker:where you're at and why things have happened, some of the historical context.
Speaker:In that case, it was just a context about communication and, um, very, very
Speaker:misleading by the Conservative Party.
Speaker:And, um, James O'Brien, I was going to play the clip, but it's a bit long.
Speaker:He found one where, um, Ritchie, Ritchie Soonak was with a group
Speaker:of schoolboys and they were obviously referring to soft drink.
Speaker:But he said to the schoolboys, yes, I'm addicted to coke.
Speaker:Totally addicted to coke.
Speaker:James O'Brien was saying, well there you go, he's a drug
Speaker:addict, he's addicted to coke.
Speaker:What more do you need to know?
Speaker:Like, we could just be running ads saying that, if what you've said is acceptable.
Speaker:And there were other examples where people had made So had
Speaker:he put this to the MP involved?
Speaker:A reporter did, to the chairman of the Tory party.
Speaker:And, um, and said, it's misinformation.
Speaker:It portrays something inaccurate to people online.
Speaker:And the guy replied, it highlights an issue of anti Semitism at the
Speaker:heart of the Labor Party and it's not been edited, it's been clipped.
Speaker:And the reporter said, that's exactly the same thing.
Speaker:And the chairman said, no, it's actually quite different.
Speaker:And, um, and he just fobbed it off.
Speaker:Hmm.
Speaker:Yes.
Speaker:Yeah, we, we've never been at war with Eurasia.
Speaker:Yes, indeed.
Speaker:1984, we've up to the, uh, yes.
Speaker:40th anniversary.
Speaker:I think it was this week.
Speaker:Something like that.
Speaker:Oh yeah, of course.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Navalny, that guy had a death wish, didn't he?
Speaker:Going back to Russia.
Speaker:It was, with the benefit of hindsight, a foolish thing for him to do.
Speaker:You know, he went back there with a former KGB agent and
Speaker:that sort of stuff as president.
Speaker:I just think to myself he was probably asking for it.
Speaker:You know, he was arrested when he returned and that sort of thing
Speaker:and then they got him in prison.
Speaker:And now he's suddenly collapsed and died.
Speaker:You know, and I bet you bottom dollar there'll be no
Speaker:autopsy or anything like that.
Speaker:He's probably already been cremated.
Speaker:Well, yeah, the family have been searching for his body and his body has disappeared
Speaker:and nobody's quite sure where it's got to.
Speaker:So he's been cremated for us.
Speaker:Just, you know, he was alive and living in a different country
Speaker:and he voluntarily went back.
Speaker:I know.
Speaker:Immediately arrested and thrown into jail.
Speaker:He went back allegedly because he loved his country.
Speaker:And he wanted to rescue his country from the groups of Vladimir Putin.
Speaker:Yeah, I don't know if he'd do it from in the country.
Speaker:No, it's one of those things, because anyone that comes along that's going to
Speaker:be a credible threat to Vladimir Putin is going to find himself in prison.
Speaker:Yeah, it's been very brave, or very stupid, or both, but um I
Speaker:think he's probably very crazy brave, you know, doing it.
Speaker:I have some close friends who are from Iran, I'm glad they got out.
Speaker:Yeah, exactly.
Speaker:You know, it's one of those things, it's, um, I wouldn't want to be
Speaker:still living there, you know?
Speaker:I'm not sure that Navalny was, um, a saint either, like, he just read
Speaker:different things, his association with Nazis and stuff, he knows where
Speaker:the truth lies in all that stuff, but he had some unsavoury incidents.
Speaker:Probably, if he's human, he's almost certainly, but Yeah, I mean
Speaker:Who hasn't had a dinner party with a group of Nazis and, you know.
Speaker:Yeah, but when you're, when you're, when you are Russian and that sort of
Speaker:thing, you've got to realize that, um, your democracy is only as old as Russia
Speaker:itself, which is what, 20 or 30 years or something like that since the, um,
Speaker:end of the, end of the, uh, Cold War.
Speaker:Democracy was there for about five years before it disappeared.
Speaker:Yeah, I know it was, and it's just one of those things.
Speaker:It's, um, democracy's overrated.
Speaker:So it's, no, it's not overrated.
Speaker:I, I think there's, there's levels isn't there?
Speaker:Mm-Hmm.
Speaker:. Yeah.
Speaker:There's, there's Julian Assange who is in Bell Marsh Prison, who is about to be put
Speaker:in a show trial, and then there's Navalny who was taken off to the Arctic Circle
Speaker:and then died in mysterious circumstances.
Speaker:Mm-Hmm mm-Hmm.
Speaker:I, I, I think there are levels.
Speaker:Neither are good.
Speaker:But I would suggest that Russia is considerably worse.
Speaker:Who was the American guy who, um, was involved with all the celebrities
Speaker:with, um, sex with underage girls, who was in America and died of
Speaker:suicide in strange circumstances?
Speaker:Who was that?
Speaker:Epstein.
Speaker:Epstein.
Speaker:So, you know, a lot of people said about that.
Speaker:Did he really commit suicide?
Speaker:You know, it was very convenient for a lot of people that he died.
Speaker:It was very convenient for a lot of senior people, yes.
Speaker:What would you think has been the case with him?
Speaker:With Epstein.
Speaker:Epstein, Epstein, whatever.
Speaker:You know, there's a fair chance he was bumped off by powerful people as well.
Speaker:Yeah, there was.
Speaker:So, you know, and that was in a democracy.
Speaker:Yeah, but, so, even Donald Trump, would he be that stupid to do something like that?
Speaker:Potentially.
Speaker:It's a pretty strong chance that something happened to him.
Speaker:Yes, but is Donald Trump in prison currently on Trump, on
Speaker:Trump charges and likely to die under mysterious circumstances?
Speaker:No, he's not.
Speaker:Webstein wasn't the opposition, wasn't the opposition leader.
Speaker:Exactly.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:But he was a person who was uncomfortable for a number of
Speaker:powerful people to have alive.
Speaker:And it would be very easy in a prison.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:So all I'm doing is just pointing out that we can sit here and go, oh, you know,
Speaker:those Russians who don't have democracies allowing this sort of shit to happen.
Speaker:And we really, you know, you don't have to look too far and
Speaker:you find something similar.
Speaker:I think it's a different level.
Speaker:Yeah, I agree.
Speaker:It's one of those things.
Speaker:It's just, um, it is a very different thing that's happening
Speaker:No, Assange is being treated very badly But there's no chance of him.
Speaker:There's no chance of him dying other than by his own hand What about Epstein?
Speaker:Well Epstein, I don't know.
Speaker:It's one of those things Was he actually murdered?
Speaker:Potentially.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Do I actually believe that the royal family had anything to do with it?
Speaker:No, I don't you know So, I think if another prisoner had arranged
Speaker:it, they would, quite possibly.
Speaker:Sorry, you just faded out a bit there.
Speaker:I said if another prisoner in Epstein's prison had caused an accident, then
Speaker:I think they'd be rather well off.
Speaker:Hmm.
Speaker:I think there were a lot of vested interests who might well
Speaker:have been willing to pay money.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Whether that happened or not, I don't know, but Yeah.
Speaker:It would certainly have been convenient.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:So I guess it might have been another prisoner who bumped off
Speaker:Navalny, like you never know.
Speaker:Oh, well, Navalny was obviously poisoned, you know, so, all right,
Speaker:uh, that's Navalny murdered, almost certainly, one would think, but, um.
Speaker:Still on Russia, um, there's talk about a growing push amongst some
Speaker:Western nations, including the U.
Speaker:S., to use Russian assets that they froze at the beginning of the war
Speaker:to fund Ukraine's military, and there's a plan circulating that
Speaker:could see around, uh, 300 billion U.
Speaker:S.
Speaker:dollars worth of Russian assets currently frozen in the West being
Speaker:seized and handed over to Ukraine.
Speaker:That's the talk.
Speaker:That be a good idea, Scott?
Speaker:Ah, no, because I think Russia would seize assets that belong to Western governments
Speaker:and that sort of stuff in Russia.
Speaker:Yes, that's true.
Speaker:So I just think to myself that the payback wouldn't be worth it.
Speaker:I read something that said something like that, that uh, there's probably
Speaker:an equivalent amount of Western assets in Russia that they would
Speaker:simply then say, Ah, all this handy mining equipment and whatever you've
Speaker:got here and other industrial stuff.
Speaker:We'll seize that.
Speaker:Thank you very much.
Speaker:So, uh, so that could happen.
Speaker:Um, uh, Russia will just become more self reliant.
Speaker:And the other thing, of course, is that other countries will
Speaker:lose faith in things like U.
Speaker:S.
Speaker:bonds and other investments that the U.
Speaker:S.
Speaker:could confiscate.
Speaker:So, um, the way Venezuela's assets were seized.
Speaker:Certainly scared off a number of people, and I think the Germans, who
Speaker:owned gold in, um, Is it Fort Knox?
Speaker:I would have thought so, that's where their main gold reserves are.
Speaker:Countries like Germany said You know that gold that we've got in America, we should
Speaker:probably bring it back over here just in case we do something they don't like
Speaker:and they decide to confiscate our gold.
Speaker:So I think, um, I think it'd be a risky move in that other countries will
Speaker:start to worry about investing in U.
Speaker:S.
Speaker:fishery bonds and other things.
Speaker:It sounds like a very good idea when you first read it, but then you've actually
Speaker:got to think about it and think, well, Russia could then Pinch everything that
Speaker:belongs to us over there, you know, it's, yeah, I don't think it's, I don't,
Speaker:I honestly think it's probably in a half a thought bubble that a Republican
Speaker:has dreamed up and that sort of stuff because he doesn't want to spend any
Speaker:US dollars on the um, Reparation War.
Speaker:Reparations are not something new.
Speaker:Germany was crippled with reparations.
Speaker:And that led to the Second World War.
Speaker:Yes.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Apparently the guy pushing the idea is the guy who pushed for the Majinsky, um,
Speaker:laws, which were the ones where, say, Western governments could, um, basically,
Speaker:Confiscate the assets of, of leading players in totalitarian governments and
Speaker:seize their personal assets and not allow them to travel and things like that.
Speaker:So, it was the guy behind promoting those laws that is promoting this
Speaker:idea of seizing Russian assets.
Speaker:Anyway, uh, skipping back to Julian Assange.
Speaker:So, this one came from you, uh, Joe, is that right?
Speaker:You want to tell people what that guy's idea is?
Speaker:Sorry, which one?
Speaker:The, the guy with the, the artist.
Speaker:The artist in France.
Speaker:Oh, I see, yeah.
Speaker:Sorry, I hadn't realised that I had shared it.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Um, so an artist has decided to lock up a bunch of, uh, fairly
Speaker:valuable paintings in a safe.
Speaker:Along with some acid.
Speaker:And, um, if Assange dies in prison, generally under mysterious circumstances,
Speaker:the paintings that are in that safe will be destroyed by acid.
Speaker:Hmm.
Speaker:So He says this is trying to reflect on people that a human life is
Speaker:worth more than this valuable art.
Speaker:We get so upset at the thought of the art being destroyed.
Speaker:Um, but really, not, not just a human life.
Speaker:I, I did have a big discussion with an online group who Were,
Speaker:he's a rapist, he deserves anything that comes to him, fuck him.
Speaker:Uh, without realising that this is actually quite an important precedence
Speaker:around the freedom of the press.
Speaker:And I think that's the important point here, is whatever you think of him as
Speaker:a human being, it's a scary thought as far as press freedoms are concerned.
Speaker:Yeah, so apparently he claims to have 45 million dollars worth of art, and
Speaker:um, yeah, there's a dead man's switch.
Speaker:So, there's a 24 hour countdown timer, which gets reset before it reaches
Speaker:zero to prevent the corrosive substance from being released into the vault.
Speaker:And the timer is reset when someone close to Assange confirms he is
Speaker:still alive in prison each day.
Speaker:So Does sound very Bond esque, doesn't it?
Speaker:It does, doesn't it?
Speaker:It really sounds like something out of a No doubt inspired by a movie, but the
Speaker:idea that this clock is just ticking down and somebody has to get in and say, yes,
Speaker:he's still alive and then it resets and that's going to be done every 24 hours.
Speaker:And apparently some significant artwork, um, artwork by Rembrandt,
Speaker:Picasso and Andy Warhol.
Speaker:And, uh, it's been donated by different people who have, uh, a few of whom
Speaker:have confirmed, yes, I've donated.
Speaker:Rembrandt, and I'm not telling you which one it was, but he does, he does have it.
Speaker:So, seems legit.
Speaker:Interesting.
Speaker:Sounds legit and that sort of stuff.
Speaker:It's just one of those things.
Speaker:It's, um, you know, if we can take it back and everything like that, he
Speaker:was originally arrested for, well, he was originally facing extradition to
Speaker:Sweden, but the reason why he ducked into the, um, Ecuadorian Embassy was
Speaker:because Sweden wouldn't guarantee that he wouldn't be sent to the U.
Speaker:S.
Speaker:Which, I don't know, it's one of those things that those original charges were
Speaker:quite vile and all that sort of stuff.
Speaker:So, yeah.
Speaker:Anyway, I just think to myself, if he hadn't have actually interfered in the
Speaker:US elections and all that sort of stuff, if he hadn't have, if he hadn't have
Speaker:released all those emails and everything else that, um, Hillary had, then he
Speaker:probably wouldn't have, he probably wouldn't have attracted so much attention.
Speaker:Because, you know, you've got the Republicans that want to
Speaker:hang him, and then you've got the Democrats also want to hang him.
Speaker:Although, bizarrely, it was under Trump.
Speaker:Sorry?
Speaker:It was under Trump that the Extradition was ordered and, um, that was after
Speaker:Trump benefited from those emails.
Speaker:Yeah, I know, which doesn't make a hell of sense to me.
Speaker:It's just one of those things that one would hope that, um, they will see
Speaker:sense and that they will actually call off the dogs and that sort of stuff.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:It's one of those things.
Speaker:He has been awarded a, um some type of award for his journalism
Speaker:and that sort of stuff.
Speaker:Yeah, he won a major Australian journalism award.
Speaker:He's definitely a journalist.
Speaker:Yeah, I know.
Speaker:It's one of those things.
Speaker:It's just that, um, I would have thought that that should be enough
Speaker:that the Yanks would actually have to back down because he was a journalist.
Speaker:Well, the fact that, uh, some valuable artwork is facing, um, destruction.
Speaker:I don't think, I don't think it's going to worry the people who are
Speaker:actually making the decisions.
Speaker:So, um, but an interesting, um, arrangement there.
Speaker:It's almost Landon Hardbottom would be, would be proud of it.
Speaker:I would have thought.
Speaker:I don't know that.
Speaker:It's going to change minds, um, in senior decision making.
Speaker:I think it might bring some public attention to the fact.
Speaker:I can't imagine it getting a heck of a lot of extra people out there in the
Speaker:streets protesting because of their love of art, and they're suddenly
Speaker:then going to protest to save it.
Speaker:This doesn't make a lot of sense.
Speaker:Ah, moving on.
Speaker:There was an essential report, but you know what?
Speaker:There was nothing particularly interesting in it, so I'm
Speaker:just going to let that one go.
Speaker:Um, so there was that one.
Speaker:Um, did come across one about support for, um, the different energy sources.
Speaker:This is Australia, and it was an Australian Financial Review
Speaker:poll, and sample size was 1, 000, so that's good enough.
Speaker:And people are asked, um, their support for energy sources, and 84 percent support
Speaker:solar, 61 percent support onshore wind, only 58 percent support offshore wind.
Speaker:Can you think of a reason why anyone would I can't understand why wouldn't,
Speaker:why wouldn't you be more supportive of offshore wind as opposed to onshore wind?
Speaker:That's what I would have thought.
Speaker:Because offshore wind, I think, is possibly a little more jarring,
Speaker:assuming it's visible from the coast.
Speaker:There's something about looking out to sea and seeing a great big field
Speaker:of windmills sitting out there.
Speaker:See, I've got a friend of mine that lives in Wales and she reckons there
Speaker:is a noise from those wind turbines.
Speaker:It's not that bad, but it's something that does, if it goes on overnight
Speaker:and all that sort of stuff, it possibly would irritate you overnight.
Speaker:So I can understand why you'd want offshore wind as opposed to onshore wind.
Speaker:Just surprises me that there'd be a difference between the two.
Speaker:Uh, ly 56% support natural gas, 47% hydrogen only, 35%.
Speaker:John support nuclear and 33% support coal.
Speaker:So, uh, I did see a conversation article talking about, um, hydrogen mm-Hmm.
Speaker:as a possible fuel source and asking people whether they supported
Speaker:green hydrogen or blue hydrogen.
Speaker:Mm-Hmm, the ancy.
Speaker:Um, and they, rather than talking about colors, explain the difference.
Speaker:Basically, green hydrogen is used, is, is breaking down water into hydrogen
Speaker:and oxygen, using excess electricity, and blue hydrogen is using hydrocarbons,
Speaker:which gives a high, um, carbon dioxide.
Speaker:Yep.
Speaker:So, it's still a polluter of fossil.
Speaker:Yeah, that's why if you, if you're going to talk about hydrogen,
Speaker:you'd have to, you'd have to actually talk about green hydrogen.
Speaker:Good point.
Speaker:And I think they're saying a lot of people are amenable to starting on blue
Speaker:hydrogen and moving to green hydrogen.
Speaker:You just cut out again a bit then, Joe, for some reason.
Speaker:Don't I?
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Might have been your internet or something, so.
Speaker:Just the last few words.
Speaker:So yeah, that was that.
Speaker:Um, then speaking of, you know, political prisoners or people in totalitarian
Speaker:regimes being punished like it would never happen in a democracy, uh, we had
Speaker:Um, and Australia's outcry at China's death sentence for Yang Hanzhong.
Speaker:And um, so, a suspended death sentence was handed out to Australian Chinese
Speaker:pro democracy writer Yang Hanzhong.
Speaker:H E N G J U N, however that's pronounced.
Speaker:How would you pronounce that, Joe?
Speaker:Oh, I don't know.
Speaker:Hung John?
Speaker:Something like that?
Speaker:I don't know.
Speaker:Let's just call him Yang.
Speaker:Yeah, that's probably his surname, isn't it?
Speaker:Yang?
Speaker:Yeah, we'll just call him Yang because that's easy.
Speaker:Um, so it was a secret trial in China in May 2021.
Speaker:And, um, so it's a 5 year wait for the sentence, it's illustrated the opacity
Speaker:of the Chinese justice system, um, Penny Wong has indicated, um, well, according
Speaker:to this article, what's this article from?
Speaker:Oh, I didn't say where it was from, but, um, Penny Wong has indicated the
Speaker:hypocrisy Or, at least, the fatal lack of self awareness of the Australian
Speaker:Government, because she described the sentence as appalling and harrowing,
Speaker:saying the Government would be communicating its response to Beijing
Speaker:in the strongest terms, and that the Chinese ambassador to Australia has
Speaker:been summoned by the Department of Foreign Affairs, and there's speculation
Speaker:in this article that the particular ambassador is not shy, and he might
Speaker:mention to the Australian authorities.
Speaker:Whistleblowers like David McBride, left with no choice than to plead guilty
Speaker:to leaking classified information.
Speaker:Richard Boyle, who awaits trial.
Speaker:Julian Assange, of course, in Belmarsh.
Speaker:And former pilot Daniel Duggan, who's been locked up in solitary confinement
Speaker:for 15 months at the behest of the US over accusations of providing
Speaker:military training to Chinese pilots.
Speaker:So, it's just an example where, okay, doesn't sound
Speaker:great what's happened to Yang.
Speaker:But then, people in glasshouses should be careful about throwing
Speaker:stones, or at least be aware of their own misdemeanours when they do.
Speaker:So, kind of matches up with what we were saying earlier about Epstein and Navalny.
Speaker:Hmm.
Speaker:Hmm.
Speaker:Um, Joe.
Speaker:What was he originally sentenced for?
Speaker:Which one?
Speaker:Yang, what was he originally sentenced for?
Speaker:Uh, supposedly working against, for being a spy, I think,
Speaker:working against China as a spy.
Speaker:So he was a Chinese spy and he was very outspoken.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Overseas, and I think.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:And he started writing fictional novels, which involved a character
Speaker:that seemed a lot like himself.
Speaker:Yeah, um, another guy with a death wish, because he was not in
Speaker:China, and he went back to China after all that and got arrested.
Speaker:Yeah, so apparently his wife and child were getting their visas renewed.
Speaker:Yes.
Speaker:And they had to leave the country, I think.
Speaker:And he went back with them, even though he was an Australian
Speaker:citizen and didn't have to.
Speaker:Right, so his wife and child were going back to China to get their visas
Speaker:renewed for Australia, were they?
Speaker:Uh, something like that, I guess.
Speaker:Well, he lived in the US, but Yeah, and he didn't have to, but he went
Speaker:voluntarily, and just like that, he got swooped up upon arrival.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Um, religion.
Speaker:So, we haven't spoken about India much lately, but, uh, a bill has
Speaker:been Um, drafted, which, um, will impose a common law on all Indians
Speaker:that's particularly aimed at Muslims.
Speaker:That's what the critics say.
Speaker:So the Uniform Civil Code, um, from Modi's Hindu government is going to force
Speaker:Indians of all faiths to subscribe to the same laws on marriage, divorce and
Speaker:inheritance, banning polygamy and giving women and men equal rights to inherit.
Speaker:Opponents of the law say it targets the 200 million Muslims in India.
Speaker:Since independence, India has allowed religious communities to follow
Speaker:their own laws on issues such as divorce, marriage, property rights,
Speaker:inheritance and child custody.
Speaker:And for the Muslim communities, this is governed by Sharia or Islamic law.
Speaker:So the bill would ban a Muslim practice called Halalah, in which a Muslim woman
Speaker:who has been divorced by her husband must marry another man, have sexual relations
Speaker:with him, and then divorce him if she wishes to remarry her first husband.
Speaker:Sharia allows a Muslim man to have more than one wife, so
Speaker:he may do so under Indian law.
Speaker:If a Hindu or Christian man takes a second wife, he is guilty of adultery.
Speaker:So, um, so there we go, India forcing Muslims to abide by a common set of laws.
Speaker:Gentlemen, your thoughts?
Speaker:I've got absolutely no problem with that at all.
Speaker:It's almost certainly driven by the BJP.
Speaker:Yeah, it is.
Speaker:Of Islam.
Speaker:Yeah, absolutely.
Speaker:But I have no problems with, I mean, it should never have
Speaker:happened in the first place.
Speaker:Mm-Hmm.
Speaker:That different groups of people have different sets of rules.
Speaker:Mm-Hmm.
Speaker:There should be a, a uniform set of laws for everybody.
Speaker:Exactly.
Speaker:Um, because the people I feel for are the apostates, the people who don't
Speaker:want to live under Islamic law, but are deemed Muslims and are apostates
Speaker:and are, um, under the death sentence.
Speaker:If they say, well actually I don't like these laws and I
Speaker:don't want to be part of them.
Speaker:We're all in agreement on that one.
Speaker:Mm.
Speaker:The motivations may be sketchy.
Speaker:The motivations are entirely the principles is what they've
Speaker:actually arrived on is fine.
Speaker:But the motivations for it are, I think it's, it's a stopped clock, isn't it?
Speaker:Mm-Hmm.
Speaker:It happens to be right twice a day.
Speaker:There we go.
Speaker:Got a fun clip here.
Speaker:This one.
Speaker:I will grab this one 'cause I, um, this was one where I bookmarked it and
Speaker:thought, I think this one will be good.
Speaker:But I never actually listened to it until this afternoon, and I
Speaker:was quite pleased with the ending.
Speaker:The ending on this is a cracker.
Speaker:So, um, we're moving on to Trump now, and, you know, just, it's Teflon
Speaker:coated for so many Republicans.
Speaker:Have a listen to this.
Speaker:What are your thoughts about the Trump indictment?
Speaker:It's probably garbage.
Speaker:Probably garbage?
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Did you read it?
Speaker:No.
Speaker:Okay, and then what about the audio recording that got released?
Speaker:Probably garbage.
Speaker:You didn't listen to it?
Speaker:How would you know it's garbage if you don't even look into it?
Speaker:Some serious things are being, uh, accused here.
Speaker:Like, tell me what it is.
Speaker:Mishandling and, uh, classified documents.
Speaker:Holding on to them when he wasn't supposed to have them.
Speaker:Uh, violating a subpoena.
Speaker:Lying to federal authorities.
Speaker:Obstructing an investigation.
Speaker:Conspiring with other staffers to move around documents to keep federal
Speaker:authorities from getting them.
Speaker:Eh Sounds, uh, sounds pretty serious but
Speaker:Doesn't everybody do that?
Speaker:I love that last bit.
Speaker:Doesn't everybody do that?
Speaker:Look, I could be wrong with my memory, but um, when Boogie Board Girl got caught
Speaker:with the marijuana in Indonesia Dad was being interviewed about how, no they
Speaker:weren't honestly a problem with the law I mean, sure he's got a few drink driving,
Speaker:but Uh, offences, but doesn't everybody?
Speaker:Yeah, that's I was just remembering that interview.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:I love that.
Speaker:Yeah, doesn't everybody do that?
Speaker:Well, yeah.
Speaker:Isn't everybody a criminal?
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Apparently so.
Speaker:Now, where are we at with the, uh, with the Trump stuff?
Speaker:So, um Um, well, before we get onto that, we're going to talk about what
Speaker:the different cases are that he's facing, but just briefly, there was that
Speaker:ruling, um, about how he had, uh, lied as to the valuation of his properties,
Speaker:which enabled him then to get loans and get cheaper interest rates and, um,
Speaker:Uh, so a judge has come down with an extremely hefty penalty on that one.
Speaker:I don't think I've got it written down here for some reason.
Speaker:353 million dollars.
Speaker:Enormous sum and banned from being involved in companies
Speaker:and also his sons in New York.
Speaker:They, yeah, they wanted to, but they got overturned.
Speaker:He has to be supervised.
Speaker:Ah, okay.
Speaker:So the supervisor stays in place, because there is a supervisor at the
Speaker:moment, which annoys the heck out of him.
Speaker:So, the supervisor looks at the, uh, things that they're running and,
Speaker:and, uh, keeps an eye on things.
Speaker:So, um, uh, just re So yeah, so when, when we're just looking at one with,
Speaker:what is a Trump supporter thing?
Speaker:Well, you know, doesn't everybody do that?
Speaker:And in relation to this sort of property valuation fraud, um, issue, I was just
Speaker:reading a tweet by this guy, Simon, somebody, who said, um, Judge Angoran
Speaker:is expected to rule against Trump any moment now for something really bizarre.
Speaker:He got the loans from the banks, he repaid them with interest, nobody complained.
Speaker:Ahead of the presidential election, Newell charged him with allegedly inflating
Speaker:his assets to get favourable loans.
Speaker:Going by that logic, most business people in America would be in prison.
Speaker:All business people claim they are worth more than they really are, and
Speaker:it's the job of the bank to verify any information before granting loans.
Speaker:For those who are celebrating this, or are claiming that this is not politically
Speaker:motivated, ask yourself this question.
Speaker:How many top businessmen and women are in prison in New York for getting loans, and
Speaker:then paying back their loans in full, and with interest, paying all their taxes,
Speaker:and the salaries of all their employees?
Speaker:If you find some, I'd like to interview them.
Speaker:So, you know, again, this will just be the reaction of a lot of Trump supporters.
Speaker:Um, it was a victimless paper type crime.
Speaker:He paid his money.
Speaker:You're all picking on him.
Speaker:Yeah, I know that, but apparently I saw something on Instagram, I think, where it
Speaker:said that, um, what he actually claimed the valuation of Mar a Lago was 1.
Speaker:5 million dollars.
Speaker:No, 1.
Speaker:5 billion dollars, I think it was.
Speaker:And they then went and had a look at the tallest building in,
Speaker:what's the capital of the UAE?
Speaker:Dubai.
Speaker:Yes.
Speaker:Yeah, Dubai.
Speaker:And they said this cost 1.
Speaker:5 billion dollars to build at the time.
Speaker:So then they said, who honestly believes that um, Mar a Lago is worth 1.
Speaker:5 billion dollars compared to this building?
Speaker:Yeah, I think there's similar comparisons with Buckingham Palace and, and just,
Speaker:you know, it had been valued on the basis that it was X number of square
Speaker:metres, when in fact it was about, you know, a tenth of that size, so.
Speaker:Yeah, a whole bunch of things.
Speaker:But, yeah, I guess the thing is, just the way people will find an
Speaker:excuse for anything that he does.
Speaker:If you have the motivated reasoning to do it.
Speaker:And the smarter you are, the better reasons you'll come up with and the
Speaker:better you'll be able to articulate them.
Speaker:So, essentially he's got four Cases that he's still dealing with, which is, um,
Speaker:a federal case related to his efforts to retain power after the election and
Speaker:the January 6th attack on the Capitol.
Speaker:So, charges have been filed, no trial date.
Speaker:There's, um, a Georgia election case relating to, um, Trump's efforts to
Speaker:reverse the election loss in Georgia.
Speaker:Again, charges filed, no court date.
Speaker:We've got the Classified Documents case, so this relates
Speaker:to the documents at Mar a Lago.
Speaker:In the toilet?
Speaker:Stored in the toilet, famously, as we saw.
Speaker:That one has a trial date set, and that is set for Um, May 20th, so that's coming up.
Speaker:Bearing in mind the election is in November, so the Classified Documents
Speaker:case trial has been set for May.
Speaker:Election in November.
Speaker:And there's another one which is the Manhattan Hush Money case, relating
Speaker:to payments to cover up a sex scandal.
Speaker:I think that must be Stormy Daniels.
Speaker:I would have thought so, yeah.
Speaker:Again, trial date set.
Speaker:And that one is set for March, coming up soon.
Speaker:So, two trials set, two of them still not set, but at least we'll, yeah,
Speaker:see how those pan out for the Don.
Speaker:Any thoughts on Donald Trump in the election, while I get
Speaker:some, um, PowerPoint ready?
Speaker:Um, he could actually win it, you know, um, Joe Biden is far too old to
Speaker:be running, but anyway, he's running.
Speaker:It's one of those things, it looks like Joe Biden has been overcome
Speaker:with a sense of hubris and that sort of stuff, thinking that he's
Speaker:the only one that can defeat Trump.
Speaker:defeat Donald Trump.
Speaker:Now, I would have had a hell of a lot more respect for him had he actually
Speaker:done what he originally said, which was he said that he's got to, um, that
Speaker:he's got to be the, uh, bridging gap.
Speaker:You know, he was just going to bridge that gap between the next generation.
Speaker:Had he actually done that, I'd have a hell of a lot more respect for
Speaker:him, but the fact that he's sticking around for another tilt at it.
Speaker:It's one of those things I just think to myself that the whole thing
Speaker:could come crashing down around it.
Speaker:I did see an article saying comparing him to Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Speaker:Absolutely.
Speaker:And saying that she stuck around too long when she Oh, she did stick around
Speaker:too long, and you know, I loved a hell of a lot of what she ruled and
Speaker:that sort of stuff, but bloody hell.
Speaker:You know, she's got to understand she's mortal.
Speaker:She's going to die at some point.
Speaker:And that she just stuck around, and she died while Donald Trump was
Speaker:in office, so he was able to put in that Amy Coney Barrett bitch.
Speaker:You know?
Speaker:Yep, so, uh, anyway, so that's Donald Trump, and Joe, you came
Speaker:across something with, uh, UK youth.
Speaker:And a guy called John Byrne Murdoch?
Speaker:Yeah, he's the Financial Times data scientist.
Speaker:And I thought it was going to be very right wing and it wasn't.
Speaker:It was quite fascinating.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:So, talking about UK youth and their views of the world.
Speaker:And, um, so, he says We often talk about an age divide in
Speaker:politics with young people much less conservative than the old.
Speaker:Um, he says this is much more of a British phenomenon than a global one.
Speaker:40 percent of young Americans voted for Trump, but only 10 percent
Speaker:of UKs under 30s support the conservatives, and he's asking why.
Speaker:And there's a chart on the screen, UK are on the left.
Speaker:And, um, so the lower age groups in the 20 to 30s, the support for conservatives is
Speaker:way down at the 10 percent level, and it's a red line there if you're able to see it.
Speaker:In terms of the other countries, they have a much higher
Speaker:support at the 20 to 30 mark.
Speaker:And so, yes, based on that chart, the youth of the UK really hate the
Speaker:Conservatives much more than the youth in other countries such as
Speaker:the US, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Spain or the Netherlands do.
Speaker:So, you know, the other countries generally speaking, show people getting
Speaker:more conservative as they get older, but they don't have the complete
Speaker:abandonment of conservative people in that 20 to 30 year age group.
Speaker:No.
Speaker:So, um, the next chart shows that this wasn't always the case.
Speaker:So same sort of data, but going back to 2015 and, um.
Speaker:You see that the red line for opinion was much more in line with other countries.
Speaker:So, this move in the 20 to 30 year age group in the UK against
Speaker:the Conservative Party has really happened in the last nine years.
Speaker:So, um, so that was that one.
Speaker:Why would that be the case?
Speaker:And he's, um, suggesting, well one reason would be housing, and young
Speaker:people are struggling to get onto the housing ladder in many countries, but
Speaker:the crisis is especially deep in Britain.
Speaker:So, there is a chart showing young adult home ownership rates collapsing
Speaker:in the UK, um, a much greater rate than in the US, Germany and France, so that
Speaker:could be a reason of disenchantment by people, um, uh, so, and of course the
Speaker:Tories have been in power, so the young people would be blaming the Tories for
Speaker:the fact that their home ownership has deteriorated because they've actually
Speaker:been in power during that time.
Speaker:Whereas in other countries, for example, uh, there might have
Speaker:been a mixture of left and right wing governments during that time.
Speaker:Um, so he compares then with Canada and showing that the Canadian Tories
Speaker:have made huge gains with young adults.
Speaker:And he shows a chart, um, pointing that out and Really suggesting that that is
Speaker:possibly, possibly off the back of some ambitious house building proposals.
Speaker:So, the Canadian Conservative Party has actually come up with different policies
Speaker:on house building proposals which might have meant that their young people are
Speaker:favour with the Conservatives in Canada.
Speaker:And, uh, he talks about incomes in the UK for young people being worse
Speaker:than incomes for young people in other countries, um, British youth, uh, less
Speaker:faith in upward mobility compared to other countries, and, um, what else does he say?
Speaker:A couple of other factors, he says that, um, it's often underappreciated
Speaker:how much faster and bigger the expansion of university education
Speaker:has been in the UK versus elsewhere.
Speaker:And today, considerably more Brits are graduates than young Americans, and
Speaker:if you're a graduate of a university, education is a big factor, of course, in
Speaker:whether you are left or right these days.
Speaker:And, um, and of course, incumbency.
Speaker:The Tories have been in power for 14 years, and a lot of bad stuff
Speaker:has happened to the UK in that time.
Speaker:And therefore, they could be blamed for it because they've been the ones in power.
Speaker:Joe, as our man on the ground in the UK, as our UK correspondent.
Speaker:Did that match your sense on the ground, or you just didn't
Speaker:meet any young people at all?
Speaker:No, no, I met lots of young people, and they're certainly struggling
Speaker:to buy houses, I know that.
Speaker:Hmm.
Speaker:Um, and certainly in the big cities, uh, house prices are
Speaker:ridiculous compared to income.
Speaker:Mm hmm.
Speaker:Um, and, yeah, I think, um, the Conservatives, having been in power
Speaker:for the last 14 years, have basically cut the guts out of social services.
Speaker:In order to deliver tax cuts to the better off.
Speaker:And so a lot of young people are feeling very aggrieved at the income disparity.
Speaker:If they should.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Um, now Velvet Glove, you mentioned before about Trump winning and John in the chat
Speaker:room says, I still think there's a 50 50 chance that neither Trump or Biden will
Speaker:be healthy enough to see the election.
Speaker:I agree with you, John.
Speaker:Just have a feeling that, um, whichever one wins, anything
Speaker:could happen and one of these vice presidents could end up in power.
Speaker:You know, um, who's the lady who's sort of staying in the running in
Speaker:the Republican race, um, Nikki Haley?
Speaker:Nikki Haley.
Speaker:Nikki Haley?
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:You know, if you're a bit of a gambler, you'd think, look,
Speaker:I've got no chance of winning.
Speaker:But gee, you know, surely there's a rough chance that Trump will just
Speaker:keel over in the next six months.
Speaker:And if I'm the only one still in the race, other than Trump, you know, Then
Speaker:she automatically gets the inside running and you'd get the, you'd get the show,
Speaker:like, that would be part of your thinking if you're someone like, like her.
Speaker:I would have thought, just think, the guy could be dead within six months.
Speaker:He really wouldn't surprise me.
Speaker:And, um, if all the other candidates have dropped out of the race and
Speaker:you're the only one there, then you'd be An awful lot of prize.
Speaker:An awful lot of presidents being vice presidents before, so.
Speaker:Mmm.
Speaker:It's, it's not an unusual career path towards being vice president.
Speaker:I mean, Joe Biden for a start.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:You know, then you've also got, um, MTG?
Speaker:Sorry?
Speaker:Is it not Marjorie Taylor Greene?
Speaker:Yeah, but she's not.
Speaker:She's not.
Speaker:Sorry, who's the Democrat?
Speaker:Look, um, uh, Alexandra Ocasio Cortez.
Speaker:AOC, yes.
Speaker:Yeah, she's, um, in the House of Representatives, isn't she?
Speaker:Don't know.
Speaker:Is she even old enough yet?
Speaker:AOC?
Speaker:Oh, yeah, she needs to be 35, doesn't she?
Speaker:Yeah, she might only just not quite be old enough, but, uh.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:Anyway, no bad strategy to, to be in a hopeless position as, um, second.
Speaker:Uh, and hope doing like a Steve Bradbury, where the leader falls over and you just
Speaker:coast through to the finish line because you're the only one left standing.
Speaker:Well, that could actually happen.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:You know, it could actually happen and that's going to make Biden
Speaker:look ridiculously old compared to his much younger opposition.
Speaker:And it could happen on the other side.
Speaker:And a non Trump, and a non Trump person.
Speaker:You know, it's one of those things, I think the Democrats
Speaker:have really made the, made a very big mistake by sticking with Joe.
Speaker:And, you know, he could keel over any time.
Speaker:Or he'd attract it any time, yeah.
Speaker:Yeah, so, maybe not a bad idea running against him.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:So that you've got some profile and if he, you know, you could do a
Speaker:Bradbury on that side of politics.
Speaker:Anyway, we'll see.
Speaker:Nothing would surprise.
Speaker:Finally, last topic.
Speaker:Um, I saw this article on the ABC online news.
Speaker:Analysts say Australia is asleep at the wheel as China ramps
Speaker:up its presence in Antarctica.
Speaker:Analysts say Australia is asleep at the wheel.
Speaker:And, um, so, you need to hear just the wording used in this article.
Speaker:Dear listener, essentially China's building some research
Speaker:stations on Antarctica.
Speaker:But, um, here's how the article opens.
Speaker:When China in the ABC.
Speaker:It's not like the Australian or Courier Mail.
Speaker:When China opened its fifth research station in Antarctica this month,
Speaker:analysts sounded alarm bells about potential security threats
Speaker:on Australia's southern doorstep.
Speaker:Experts warned that China's expanding activity in Antarctica,
Speaker:combined with Australia's inaction, And a lack of funding could lead
Speaker:to Beijing's increased strategic presence in the frozen continent.
Speaker:The new Qinling base could also improve China's surveillance capabilities and
Speaker:give it more control over transport routes to exploit resources, they say.
Speaker:That's the opening three paragraphs, and then we get, However, a Chinese
Speaker:foreign ministry spokesperson insisted the news station would be
Speaker:used to provide a platform for joint scientific exploration and cooperation
Speaker:between China and other countries and help advance peace and sustainable
Speaker:development in the region, end quote.
Speaker:See, the first three paragraphs are, ooh, boogie man.
Speaker:Fourth paragraph is, however China says, nothing to see.
Speaker:And then we get, Ah, who are these experts and analysts?
Speaker:Then we get Elizabeth Buchanan from the Australian National University's
Speaker:National Security College.
Speaker:She said that the Chinese government had a remarkable
Speaker:ability to plan for the long term.
Speaker:Quote, so they may not be looking to utilise this research station for
Speaker:anything other than collaborative international research for the
Speaker:next 20 years, Dr Buchanan said.
Speaker:All of a sudden, it's a staging platform to strike, to facilitate
Speaker:war, if that day ever came.
Speaker:So, what, they reckon that you're going to sail the Armada from the
Speaker:southern, from the Antarctic, do they?
Speaker:It's, it's like an admission by her to say, well, it might be a research
Speaker:station at the moment, but those sneaky Chinese, give them another 20 years
Speaker:and it's a staging platform to strike.
Speaker:Goes on, she goes on.
Speaker:I think it's ridiculous.
Speaker:China's positioning on Qinling is covering another part of the
Speaker:Antarctic quadrant of the landmass.
Speaker:Presence is power.
Speaker:Another location means better for launching satellites.
Speaker:Yeah, I thought you'd launch satellites from the equator, not from Yeah, exactly.
Speaker:At this point, I think I then went, who is Elizabeth Buchanan?
Speaker:What is the Australian National University's National Security College?
Speaker:And It turns out that the National Security College is a college within
Speaker:the ANU basically designed for people in defence and security to go
Speaker:and get qualifications and so it's just full of defence types and it's
Speaker:funded by the government, which I assume means the Defence Department.
Speaker:So, um, so that's what we're getting when the headline says.
Speaker:Analysts say Australia is asleep at the wheel, is we're
Speaker:getting this defence funded.
Speaker:I assume it's defence funded.
Speaker:Um, Department with ANU that is predisposed to, to gathering a
Speaker:whole bunch of defence people and giving them qualifications.
Speaker:Actually what um, let me find this.
Speaker:Kevin Rudd actually launched the institution back in 2010 and he
Speaker:said it was to provide postgraduate level national security courses to
Speaker:government personnel and the public.
Speaker:And, uh, it aimed to enhance Australia's defence capability through
Speaker:a range of academic, executive and professional development courses.
Speaker:And, um, courses would be led by ANU academics as well as external
Speaker:practitioners and think tanks.
Speaker:Providing leadership programs and collaborative opportunities for
Speaker:senior national security officials.
Speaker:Just imagine that group if you were to go in there and say, well,
Speaker:you know, it's just a research station, nothing to worry about.
Speaker:Probably not the crowd who's going to like that.
Speaker:And if you were to beef it up as something that required attention from
Speaker:our defence force, you'd probably find that that's more attractive to that crowd.
Speaker:I thought the Antarctic Division were quite interesting.
Speaker:Basically saying, well, yes, we are underfunding.
Speaker:Our Antarctic Division, because all scientists always need more funding.
Speaker:Yes, so a bit later on the article, let me go back to it here, um, so, so
Speaker:after all that sort of boogeyman stuff from, um, from Elizabeth Buchanan of
Speaker:the ANU, the article then goes on to say that there is the Drake Passage,
Speaker:which is the body of water between South America in a Chinese Great Wall
Speaker:sort of research station in Antarctica.
Speaker:And basically says that because of problems with the sewers and Panama
Speaker:Canal with water levels, ships might, you know, be increasing shipping trade
Speaker:going around that part of the world.
Speaker:Buchanan says China had spent 10 years building infrastructure in Chile and
Speaker:parts of Argentina which had given it the ability to control the passage.
Speaker:They could cut off the trade passage in all sorts of ways, she said.
Speaker:They, China, could make that passage difficult to pass and control
Speaker:shipping, or by having more boats to be able to monitor and block
Speaker:the passage with their own boats.
Speaker:Goes on, no, but then, sorry, what you were about to say, Joe, was that the
Speaker:former head of Australian Antarctic Division, Tony Press, who I think is
Speaker:just a science guy, he says he does not believe the new Quinling base will
Speaker:pose an increased surveillance risk.
Speaker:Because China already has surveillance operations in other parts of the world, he
Speaker:says China's construction of the station met the fundamental obligations of the
Speaker:Antarctic Treaty for peaceful use and non militarisation as per Australia's
Speaker:inspection of the station in 2020.
Speaker:And he said what was alarming was Australia's under investment in Antarctica
Speaker:for science and logistic capabilities.
Speaker:And, um, there's more to it.
Speaker:And they said, basically, we don't have the ability to go and inspect
Speaker:stations in the middle of winter.
Speaker:And if you were really serious about this, you'd give us some capabilities,
Speaker:so that we could do a sneak inspection on China's stations in the middle of winter.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:It's just such a beat up.
Speaker:And this is by the ABC.
Speaker:And, you know, people could read this stuff and go, Goddamn Chinese again.
Speaker:You know.
Speaker:We end up in a fucking war with China.
Speaker:It's because of articles like this that just add to the beating of the drums
Speaker:because they've just built a goddamn research station in Antarctica and I
Speaker:find it incredibly frustrating and I would expect that sort of shit from
Speaker:shit rag of the Murdoch Empire and We get it from the ABC and okay In the
Speaker:middle of the article, they'll throw in some alternative view from the
Speaker:researcher, but just the whole idea of the article is one of China bashing
Speaker:over a threat, quoting people whose motivations are that they are part of the
Speaker:established wider defence force family.
Speaker:And of course they're going to beat up threats, because Um.
Speaker:More funding for them.
Speaker:Exactly.
Speaker:There we go, I found that one very frustrating.
Speaker:Sounds like you guys did too.
Speaker:It wasn't just me.
Speaker:It's one of those things, you know, I read it with an open mind and all
Speaker:that sort of stuff, but the time I got down to where the woman was
Speaker:talking and that sort of stuff, I thought to myself, she's on something.
Speaker:You know, I just thought to myself, she's been smoking too much wacky
Speaker:tobaccy, but it's you know, when you look at the original map and
Speaker:that sort of stuff, you've got three stations with the Australian flag
Speaker:on it, one, two, three, four, five stations with the Chinese flag on it.
Speaker:And you think to yourself, if you look at that, and you'd think
Speaker:the Chinese are taking over.
Speaker:Well, they're not.
Speaker:They're just expanding their research facilities down there.
Speaker:At this point, yes.
Speaker:You know, and if it came to them actually militarizing the Quindling Station, which
Speaker:I don't think they would, but if they did, then the Australians would retreat
Speaker:from that and that sort of stuff, so then they'd be left with a position of, we
Speaker:would have to send our own military down there to liquidate the Quindling Station.
Speaker:You know, but if it's any other country Putting Reece, you know, America, any
Speaker:other Western liberal democracy, it wouldn't be even talked about, no,
Speaker:then they'd be going, isn't that great?
Speaker:Wonder what they'll discover in that icy environment and what
Speaker:great new things will come of it.
Speaker:But no, it's all a threat to you.
Speaker:Western Civilization, because the Chinese have done it.
Speaker:For goodness sake.
Speaker:It's just pathetic.
Speaker:So, um, Let me see.
Speaker:I mentioned we're going to go through the chat and see what people have said.
Speaker:There were hellos from Watley and Don and Essential and John.
Speaker:Who says he's grateful that he lasted another day, and, um, John says whether
Speaker:he was murdered or not is immaterial.
Speaker:We believe he was murdered.
Speaker:It's talking about Navalny, so, yes, that would be true, doesn't
Speaker:matter, it's the perception.
Speaker:Um, so, yes, I haven't seen Jonathan Pye, and John says YouTube will
Speaker:unsubscribe you from things occasionally.
Speaker:That might be what's happened.
Speaker:Alison was there, good on you, Alison.
Speaker:Um, let's see, uh,
Speaker:maybe if Sweden had guaranteed not to extradite, we may have
Speaker:seen a resolution to the charges?
Speaker:That's true?
Speaker:Well, it's probably true, but, you know, it's just one of those things.
Speaker:He did go into that, he did go into that, um, embassy fairly early on when
Speaker:it was only the rape case and everything that was being brought against him.
Speaker:I did read the book, um, on Julian Assange and I should reread it
Speaker:or at least read my notes on it.
Speaker:I've been reading bits of it.
Speaker:Have you?
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:So, um, I'll do that before the next episode because obviously
Speaker:we're going to hear more about him.
Speaker:So we'll do that because Alison asks, was he even charged though by Sweden?
Speaker:Long story short, he grew up as a child of DV, being stalked by his stepfather,
Speaker:and there is a concern, there is a suspicion that he has a paranoia that
Speaker:has come from that, and so he was paranoid even before, um, so when he
Speaker:was effectively charged, I think he had to be charged to be extradited.
Speaker:Um, so, he was paranoid about being extradited onwards to the US.
Speaker:Yeah, so there's there's a lot of questions about his
Speaker:sanity prior to all of this.
Speaker:Yeah I think good topics next week a bit of a review on Julian Assange I think he
Speaker:always he has always looked just a little unhinged Hmm because I remember arguing
Speaker:with the 12th man because the 12th man was talking about people whose lives
Speaker:had been lost or damaged or injured as a result of The leaking of the material by
Speaker:WikiLeaks and, um, the US Department of something or other, in one of the trials,
Speaker:um, basically admitted that nobody was actually injured as a result of WikiLeaks.
Speaker:So, there were just facts like that that people need to know.
Speaker:So, that's what we'll do.
Speaker:Refresh ourselves on Julian Assange.
Speaker:Ready for next week.
Speaker:So, and have something positive, something to be grateful for.
Speaker:Big or small, for next week, gentlemen.
Speaker:That's right.
Speaker:This, uh, is my last podcast, hopefully, with, uh, glasses.
Speaker:So Why?
Speaker:What are you doing?
Speaker:You're going in for laser surgery, aren't you?
Speaker:I'm getting intraocular lenses inserted.
Speaker:On Wednesday and Thursday.
Speaker:So next week you'll be blind?
Speaker:Could be.
Speaker:Could be.
Speaker:Thanks Joe.
Speaker:How long are you the invisible man?
Speaker:So, apparently, so one eye gets done on Wednesday, the other eye on Thursday, and
Speaker:apparently I'm able to drive on Friday.
Speaker:They reckon.
Speaker:Yeah.
Speaker:So, I'm really keen that I can see distance and keep playing
Speaker:squash and see the ball well without glasses would be great.
Speaker:Uh, wouldn't worry me if I need slight reading glasses at the end of it.
Speaker:So, but we'll see how that pans out.
Speaker:So if it's not a perfect, maybe actually, and it will take a while to settle down.
Speaker:So maybe next week I might need some light glasses because it
Speaker:takes a while to settle down.
Speaker:But anyway, that will be interesting.
Speaker:You've been dared to read out the discussion about bears.
Speaker:I didn't understand it.
Speaker:Did you understand it?
Speaker:Yes.
Speaker:It was a discussion between a couple of them, that sort of stuff, to say, won't
Speaker:somebody think about the polar bears?
Speaker:And then it was a discussion about whether the polar bears were in the
Speaker:Antarctic or were they only in the Arctic?
Speaker:Ah, yes.
Speaker:And then someone said, well, they could be dressed up as penguins.
Speaker:Ah, that's it.
Speaker:At that point, I just That's right, because there are no bears in Antarctica.
Speaker:Yes, exactly.
Speaker:Yeah, but there are penguins, aren't there?
Speaker:There are shitload of penguins.
Speaker:Right, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker:Right, well, you've had fun in the chat room.
Speaker:That's good.
Speaker:I hope you've had fun listening.
Speaker:We'll be back next week.
Speaker:Talk to you then.
Speaker:Bye for now.
Speaker:Yeah, and it's a good night from me.
Speaker:And it's a good night from him.
Speaker:Good night.
